In Blog, Inverters, Micro Inverters & Optimisers

Enphase Comparison TestEnphase Microinverters are hands down the best Microinverters on the market. But is a Microinverter the right option for your home? This Enphase review will kick off with an update – a couple of YouTube videos. In these videos, I show why Enphase isn’t necessarily the shade solution we all thought it was. Below the videos, I explain the pros and cons of Enphase microinverters.

First, and most controversially, watch this video to see my test results showing Fronius working better than Enphase with 15 per cent shade! In short, the advantage that the Fronius inverter has is it makes use of the panel bypass diodes – by bypassing the shaded cell strings. In contrast, Enphase hardly ever engages the bypass diode, so ironically a bit of shade on an Enphase panel can drag the performance of the whole panel down.

In this second video, I show a situation where Enphase can work up to 8 per cent better than Fronius in the shade. In this video, I compare Fronius and Enphase using split cell solar panels, and I shade the width of the bottom of the panels from 12.30 onwards. The results favoured Enphase, but the difference was not as significant as you might think.



The Pros of Enphase Micro-inverters

1. Reliability in comparison

In the last five years, we have installed about 3200 micros on 156 homes. Half of these systems are over four years old, so they are close to halfway through their ten-year warranty period. To date, we’ve had only six microinverter failures (0.18%) and a few communication issues that I’ll address later.

You could say that 6 out of 156 jobs means about 4% of our Enphase jobs have had a failure. That’s bad compared to a quality string inverter like Fronius. However, that’s not a fair comparison. Enphase’s “decentralized power topology” ensures that if one microinverter fails, you’ll only lose the production of one panel. When a string inverter (like Fronius or SMA) fails, you lose the production of the whole system.

SolarEdge is a fairer comparison. SolarEdge uses both rooftop power electronics (optimisers) and a central point of failure (the SolarEdge Inverter). How does SolarEdge fair for reliability? 34% of our SolarEdge jobs have had at least one fault. 11% of our SolarEdge inverters have failed so far, taking the whole system down. See my SolarEdge Stats here.

At 4% of our Enphase installs with an issue, Enphase in comparison is looking pretty damn good. (Remember it’s only 0.18% of Enphase microinverters that have failed.)

I went to the broader industry to ask for help. “Solar Cutters” is a community of solar industry experts with a diverse range of experience and opinions. I posed the question:

“Enphase Microinverters are ridiculously reliable: True or False?”

The jury is in. The Solar Cutter community agrees that Enphase is certifiably reliable.

Enphase’s “decentralised power topology”, coupled with its reliability, makes Enphase stand out from any other inverter solution on the market. But inverter reliability is only one part of the equation.

2. Heavy shading

enphase for heavy shadingDespite my YouTube videos above, where I show that Enphase isn’t always the shade solution it’s cracked up to be, microinverters are the best solar inverter solution if your shading is extreme. This is because Enphase microinverters work independently of each other. If you have heavy shading and at some times during the day, just one or two panels are in the sun, those microinverters will produce power.

SolarEdge, in comparison, has to have a minimum of 6 panels in the sun to prevent production loss through voltage blocking. This is explained in-depth in my SolarEdge review.

Tigo and Huawei are also good options for shade. They do however require around three or four panels in the sun to get to the minimum operating voltage of the inverter. Read more on my Tigo review and my Huawei inverter Review. However, if shading is minimal, I prefer to use a couple of Tigo optimisers. As I explain later, the fewer Power Electronics on your roof, the better.

3. Townhouses and units

Enphase microinverters are often the best solar inverter solution for townhouses and unit situations.

  • They are cost-effective for smaller systems.
  • Because they work independently of each other, they work well on small – multi-oriented roofs.
  • You only have an indiscreet box to install on a communal wall or in your unit, keeping that whinging chairman of the body corporate happy.
  • Because we run AC cable from the roof, the cable run can usually be more discreet and snuck inside wall cavities. You are welcome, Mr Chairman.

4. Safety

String inverters like Fronius and SMA require DC cables to run from the roof to the inverter. Solar DC power is theoretically dangerous if it’s accidentally damaged. (However Australian solar installation regulations are so strict. Solar DC cables installed to today’s standards are as safe as any other electrical wiring in your home.)

Enphase microinverters, however, reduce that risk even further. Microinverters eliminate the higher DC voltages by changing each solar panel’s extra low-voltage DC power into AC power at the panel level. AC power does not have nearly the same potential for arcing as DC power.

In case of a house fire, Enphase will always be safer. Let’s say you chose a string inverter. When you turn off the main switch of your house, the DC cable from your inverter to your solar panels will still be live. That’s unwanted fuel in a house fire.

If you had chosen an Enphase System instead, when you turn off the power to your home, the cable from your switchboard to your microinverters on the roof will also turn off. Safe as house fires houses.

5. Enphase treats the panel gently

In some ways, this may be my favourite feature of microinverters. With a string system, you can run up to 600 volts and 10 amps through each panel. That’s a lot of energy through a solar panel. While panels are designed to run at 1000 volts, the less stress you can put on a product, the better. If there is shade on part of the panel, the shaded spot will consume energy, and heat up the panel. The panel will quickly engage the bypass diode to prevent heat damaging the cell or back sheet. If this happens frequently, the bypass diode could fail. With a Microinverter, only the voltage of just one panel will run through the panel. Around 40 volts and 10 amps. Will less energy becomes fewer hotspots, and the bypass diode will hardly ever have to engage. This means the bypass diode has less chance of failing. If the bypass diode does fail, it is simple to pick it up with Ephase monitoring.

6. Individual panel monitoring

Data geeks love Enphase. Enphase can monitor the production of every panel individually. But let’s see how valuable panel monitoring is.

  • Shading
    If trees are growing excessively, it could be a good indication of when to cut them back.
  • Blown bypass diodes
    Every solar panel has three bypass diodes to protect them from the shade. As mentioned above, if they activate too often, then they may fail, and you will lose 1/3 of the production of your panel. We have only ever picked up six blown bypass diodes from the 5000+ panels that we have installed with individual panel monitoring (Enphase, SolarEdge or Tigo). However we’ve had six Enphase microinverters, and 56 SolarEdge optimisers fail.
  • Underperformance from panel degradation
    While good in theory, proving that your panel has degraded by 5 per cent more than it should have is very difficult even with individual panel monitoring. That’s why it’s essential to purchase a quality panel in the first place.

Installing expensive and complicated power electonics on the roof primarily to monitor the reliability of simple and affordable technology is madness.

The cons of Enphase microinverters

1. Multiple failure points

It’s unrealistic to put power electronics behind every panel on a hot roof and expect nothing ever to go wrong. When microinverters start to fail, the effort to replace one is much more than replacing a string inverter next to your switchboard. In the last five years, we’ve only had four micro failures. We replaced those microinverters under the ten-year warranty. But, if we get back onto your roof after the warranty period, you start paying. It is likely to be extremely difficult to remove the specialised nuts, bolts, and clamps that hold the panels on your roof.

Let’s hope it’s easy to identify and access the faulty micro. Ladder up, harness on. Panel clamps may be seized depending on your rail quality and the installer’s finesse. Angle grinders come out. Replacement clamps are impossible to find ten years down the track. Should we open a can of worms and start replacing your rail?
Swapping out a string inverter in your garage would have been much more straightforward.

The end customer can purchase an extended warranty online after installation. However, the extended warranty does not include the cost of labour of fault-finding, removing, transporting or reinstalling the faulty micro.

Here’s how an extended warranty compares to purchasing a product outright.

Enphase productCostWarranty covers shipping and labour?
Enphase IQ7+ Microinverter. Comes with 10 year limited warranty.Approx. $200 retailYes in practice, but no - according to limited warranty document.
Extend to a 15 year warranty$8.13 per microNo
Extend to a 20 year warranty$18.82 per microNo
Extend to a 25 year warranty$34.25 per microNo
1 phase Envoy & Ct's (for full monitoring) comes with 5 year warrantyApprox $650 retail.Yes in practice, but no - according to limited warranty document.
Because future maintenance will become problematic and costly, we generally only recommend Enphase (or any rooftop power electronics) where shaded situations and complicated roofs necessitate.

Oh, and in case you missed it: the components that monitor production and reveal any problems you may have with your microinverters over the next 10 years … those parts are only warranted for 5 years.

2. Battery compatibility

When batteries do become financially viable, Enphase will limit your options to an AC-coupled battery solution. The main problem with AC coupling is a regulation problem. In Qld, ACT, parts of NSW and parts of Victoria, we are limited to a maximum of 10kW of inverters on each phase. And the 10 kW limit includes the sum of all the microinverters and the AC-coupled inverter/battery charger.

Effectively this means you can have a large solar system and a small battery, or a small solar system and a big battery. If you had the option to DC-couple, you could have a large solar system and a big battery. But going to Enphase does not give you that option. Read my blog on AC vs DC-coupled batteries.

3. Voltage rise

solar-voltage-rise-5Voltage rise is sometimes a significant electricity grid issue that can make your solar system turn off in the middle of the day. It’s a fairly complex issue explained in detail in this post. If you have potential voltage rise issues, we’ll need to minimise voltage rise. We’ll do this by reducing the length of the AC cable run and increasing the size of the AC cable.

If you install a string inverter like Fronius, this is simple. We install your inverter next to the switchboard and use 10mm cables. In this situation, we might only contribute 0.2% to the voltage rise.

If, however, you choose Enphase, we’ll need to run longer AC cables to your roof and run small Enphase AC cables to every panel. On a high-set complex roof, it may not be feasible to minimise the voltage rise on an Enphase AC cable below 1%.

Not every Enphase system will have a voltage rise problem, but it’s a problem worth considering.

4. Enphase’s Achilles heel

A sign of a good company is how they respond when things go wrong.

Enphase monitoring issues

Enphase monitoring uses power line communication. The microinverter monitoring is transmitted over the same 240-volt cable that powers your appliances. Powerline communication works perfectly well – until it doesn’t. Noise or electrical disturbances from your household appliances can interfere with this signal, and the monitoring stops working. Which appliances can interfere with your monitoring? The Enphase-noise-troubleshooting guide gives a comprehensive list:

Light switches, dimmers, irons, microwaves, touch lamps, computers, battery chargers, phone chargers, laptops, compact fluoros, battery backup systems, hot water diverters, export limit devices or automatic controllers, switches, power strips, surge diverters, ethernet bridges, heavy motors, water pumps, fridges, power tools and kitchen appliances.

Just about every appliance you own could interfere with Enphase microinverter monitoring. Importantly Enphase is not claiming the offending noises are outside of the relevant Australian Standard on Electromagnetic Compatability (AS: CISPR 14.1:2018). It’s just normal electrical noise that happens from everyday appliances that are screwing up Enphase communications. The problem is an Enphase problem.

As it turns out, the first time we encountered this problem on one of our installs, I was writing this blog. The timing was joyfully serendipitous. Shane, my service manager, was all over it.

“Mark, Enphase has told us we need to buy a specific filter and install it at the customer’s premises in order to fix the noise issue.” Shane told me.

“That’s fine” I replied, “As long as Enphase reimburses us for the parts and labour, it doesn’t bother me”.

“That’s the problem” Shane continued. “Enphase Tech support is telling me they don’t reimburse anything for noise issues.”

I laughed out loud. Enphase wouldn’t be so stupid, would they?

Enphase mans up

The joyful serendipity continued because the same morning, Enphase’s product line manager Andrew Mitchell had arranged to drop into my office for a meeting. I told Andrew that tech support had foolishly suggested that I’d be out of pocket to fix their communications issue. Andrew was upfront:

“I don’t know what to say, Mark. That’s the Enphase policy. Enphase expects the installer to return and install a filter at their own expense. But I get your point, you installed to our installation guidelines and best practice. We really have no excuse.

He was right. They don’t have an excuse. So I got my keyboard warrior hat on and sent a passive-aggressive email to Enphase. It only took a week until Enphase conceded their attitude was wrong. Andrew knew I was working on this blog, so gave me the below statement to share with you.

As long as the product is installed, operated, handled, and used in accordance with the Quick Install Guide, Power Line Communications failure on a micro inverter is grounds for warranty replacement and Enphase will cover parts and labour up to 10 years.  If Enphase deems that the communications failure is due to environmental noise and not a product failure it reserves the right the remedy the situation with the use of a noise filter.  

That’s good news for installers. My faith in Enphase has been restored.

Enphase has now developed a filter that seems to have solved this issue. Now we don’t have to worry every time our customer buys a new appliance.

In any case, the power line communication problem does not affect solar production. If it can be fixed by installing a filter, it’s not a massive issue. However, it’s not uncommon for Enphase to replace microinverters because of a communication issue that a filter won’t fix. Again, it’s not reasonable to install Power Electronics on a hot roof and expect nothing ever to go wrong.

Oversizing Enphase microinverters

I’ve been on a bandwagon for years, saying you should preferably avoid oversizing microinverters by 33%. String inverters often have panels in multiple orientations so they can “capacity share”. Microinverters can’t capacity share.

Enphase Comparison TestRecently I set up a side-by-side comparison on my roof attempting to quantify my argument. I installed 4x 320W panels. Two panels ran on 240W micro inverters (IQ7). The other two were connected to the larger 290W microinverters (IQ7+). I had some concerning anomalies from the IQ7+. I’ll mention those at the end of this section. But for this post, I’ll show my preliminary results which I think are conclusive enough.



Preliminary results

The blue production curve on the left is the actual production curve of 1 x north-facing 320W panel in mid-September when connected to an IQ7 microinverter. The blue graph was traced from the Enphase portal to Adobe. The red section was extrapolated from the IQ7+ data. The area was calculated with an Adobe plugin.

The IQ7 doesn’t reach the “peak output power” of 250W as per the Enphase spec. Instead, it starts clipping at 245W at about 9 am.

In September the sun is close to 90 degrees to the panels that are tilted at 25 degrees. So clipping will be close to the maximum.

The blue line was the actual production taken from the Enphase portal. The red line is “modelling” what an IQ7+ was reaching at the same time. It peaked at 295W.

The northern panel was clipped by 6.99%. The western panel wasn’t far behind.

This is only data from one perfect spring day. Without trying to predict 12 months of data, including rainy days, winter months, and different orientations, I’m close to admitting defeat. I would guestimate that the annualised losses from clipping would be approximately 2 per cent. If you work that out in dollar value, it’s probably not worth the cost of installing bigger microinverters.

If you are in Brisbane or further away from the equator, as long as your installer doesn’t oversize your microinverter by more than 33% (as per CEC guidelines), your annualised losses will be around 2%. An IQ7 is probably ok on a 320W panel and an IQ7+ can handle 385w panel. Yes, my Humble Pie was delicious.

But I’ll go down swinging with a few points you should consider.

  • If you install a 320W panel on an IQ7 micro inverter, don’t complain when your production flatlines in summer.
  • And the next time someone suggests that Enphase will yield higher because it handles panel mismatch so well: remind them Enphase can’t “capacity share.” Stick that in your pipe and smoke it.
  • Curveball: The anomaly mentioned showed that IQ7+ produces about 5% less than IQ7 at times when clipping does not occur. Enphase has not given me an acceptable answer for this. I’m heading to Silicon Valley mid0October, and I hope to get insights at Enphase HQ.


Enphase microinverters have proven so far to the industry that they are a reliable solution. While they are not necessarily the best shade solution for medium shaded, If you live in an area with extreme shade, we recommend using Enphase microinverters because they allow the panels to work independently of each other. Because of the flexibility of Enphase microinverters and the less intrusive installation methods, Enphase works well in townhouse and body corporate situations. However, rooftop power electronics will eventually fail. When they do, it could be a complicated and costly exercise to replace them. If you choose Enphase, you should also be aware of potential voltage rise issues, and understand that you are locking yourself into an AC-Coupled Battery. Also be aware that if your monitoring is intermittent, noise from an appliance may be causing it, or a microinverter signal could have failed. The good news is, Enphase will now cover the cost of installing a noise filter under warranty. Finally, I was wrong. You can oversize a microinverter by 33 per cent without losing too much yield annually. Just don’t come crying to me when it clips 6.99 per cent of your power on a spring day.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked

50 Comments on Enphase Micro-Inverter Review

Devina Rogers said :Guest Report 8 months ago

Hi Grant, we recommend Fronius above all other inverters, and here's why:

    Peter said :Guest Report one year ago

    Hi all, I have power to my gateway but no lights. The system was working and communicating now it has just stopped.any ideas anyone?? Regards Confused Aussie.

    • 2157
    Jean-Luc Kapetanovic said :Guest Report one year ago

    Very interesting blog and YT videos. I lived in France (west coast Brittany) and currently looking to install a solar system on my flat roof top (3m elevation, easily accessible, 68m2, South exposure, potential for 2x6PV + 1x6PV, total 18PV 400Wc ). distance roof to main switch board is 20m and 40m to garage if I want to install a string converter. Still currently studying which solution to choose : decentralize with Enphase or centralize in my garage with Fronius. running 40m of DC power my be challenging. Even after reading & watching videos, I am still thinking.. What would be the steps in this kind of case ? Making two scenarios and technical & cost evaluation ? Have you been in the same situation before as you seems agnostic about the technical choice and you have installed both system ?

      Elliot said :Guest Report 3 years ago

      Hi Filip. We have actually been testing APsystems micro-inverters along with Hoymiles micro-inverters for the last few months and will be releasing a new blog and youtube video review of them soon.

        Filip Grabowski said :Guest Report 3 years ago

        Have you come across AP Systems inverters? Any opinions? How do you like an idea of 1 microinverter serving 4 panels?

        • 81-874
        Mark C said :administrator Report 3 years ago

        That's simple. Unless you need Enphase for heavy shading or a complex roof that a string inverter can't do, I'd go a string inverter. Check out my Enphase youtube testing and reviews for more info.

          Stephen H said :Guest Report 3 years ago

          Hello Mark, I am currently obtaining quotes for a new solar system. Our house has three phase power supplied, primarily to run a large air conditioning system that runs on three phase power. Currently we are using around 35kW per day. There seems to be a push to install a system using Enphase micro inverters over a Fronius string inverter. However I am not convinced the micro inverters will work that well with a three phase supply and load. Shading is not a problem. Do you think the micro inverter system will be satisfactory or should I go with the string inverter system? Thanks for your advice, Stephen

          • 2234
          Frank Bakker said :Guest Report 3 years ago

          The high SolarEdge failure rate is "interesting". As a consultant I've arranged about 50 of them in the last five years. I can only remember one inverter failure caused by I think water getting into a isolator on the roof and only a few optimisers. When their was a power issue the Fronius inverters cooked at client's premises but their SolarEdge system next door simply switched off and turned back on when the issue was over.

          • 6104
          Grant McGifford said :Guest Report 3 years ago

          Hello, thanks for your comments on enphase. You mentioned that Enphase is not ideal if you have high volatge coming into your property which I have, I have a 6.4kw REC/enphase S270 Envoy S system and I want to get another 6.6kw system. I have been getting a low peak output of 4.3kw and enphase recently turned up the voltage to maximum of 258v and now I am getting 4900w peak which is increasing my solar production. If I am going to get another system to add to this are there particular inverters and panels better suited to high voltage?

          • 2482
          Ernesto Rodriguez said :Guest Report 3 years ago

          Great article, very informative. Got one question: My solar panels system was installed about month and a half ago, and at this moment 8 microinverters out 18 are not responding. Does this mean that only 10 panels are producing energy? And, it is common that this many microinverters fail in such short period? They started failing 2 at a time. Your response will be greatly appreciated.

          • 91730
          Mark C said :administrator Report 3 years ago

          Hi Kev, You could probably use the "Elighten installer toolkit", connect it to the envoy and use that set up app as a very basic monitoring. But for the full data, I believe you would need to connect it to the internet.

            Kev said :Guest Report 3 years ago

            Excellent review! Im in the process of transitioning to the solar industry.My question is does the micro-inverter have to be wi fi connected at all to operate accordingly.Can they be wired back to a key pad mounted on a wall for monitoring reasons that only the occupant can access?

            • 2425
            Dianne said :Guest Report 3 years ago

            Thanks for your information, although they did not help with my communications with Enphase, Enphase refused to help. The Envoy has not worked properly since installation and they refuse to help. Likewise the installer was not helpful and did not log the trouble shooting with Enphase, so I have no warranty. I would not use a micro inverter again.

            • 5062
            Dave Bowen said :Guest Report 4 years ago

            I found the information very helpful. I have four 275 watt panels on my motor home that I am playing with. They are now charge a 12 volt battery bank. I am thinking about changing over to microinverters. I am looking for detailed electrical information on how the little buggers interface with power co. power.

            • 27614
            Mark C said :administrator Report 4 years ago

            Hi Jordan. The expected failure rate of Enphase is not that impressive. Enphase have stated clearly that they are AIMING for 500 defective parts per million PER YEAR. (They have not reached that AIM yet). That sounds good until you do the maths. If you have one micro, you have one in 2000 chance of failure every year. Or one in 200 chance of it failing in 10 years (0.5 per cent). Multiply that by the number of optimisers, and if Enphase reaches their AIM, you have a 10 per cent chance of having one failure within the warranty period. It sounds less impressive if you say it that way, right? Then, what is the chance that you have a failure between 10 and 20 years - outside of warranty? One microinverter and one service call at a time...

              Mark C said :administrator Report 4 years ago

              Hi Markus, Thanks. If there is heavy shading, nothing compares to Enphase, so stick with that. For panels, my bias is Sunpower - but any high wattage (high efficiency) panel would do the job. That way you can have more power in the least shaded areas.

                Mark C said :administrator Report 4 years ago

                Hi Steve. Thanks for your comment - this backs up my sentiment about using overly complex products. Firstly, Enphase now has a filter that seems to be solving the issue. Who is your installer? If they are CEC Approved Solar Retailers, you could make a complaint to the CEC. Otherwise, I'd suggest leaving them a review on Google and SolarQuotes - this might get their attention. Secondly, in the perfect world - it is a warranty issue that should be solved at no expense to you. However, in reality, it's a warning to others to not go with complex systems unless required for shade or complex roofs.

                  Steve said :Guest Report 4 years ago

                  Hi Mark; I wish you were my installer. I have communication issues with my micro inverters which has been going on a long time, now the latest solution is two ferrite rings with the cable looped twice on each ring. The Australian 1800 contact number does not work, so there is no local support. My installer never returns calls. So a good system but after sales service locally is crap.

                  • 2550
                  Markus said :Guest Report 4 years ago

                  Hi Mark since a few days I found your blog and find it extremely helpful and very easy to understand even for people with not much knowledge about Solar power I'm new in Solar power too and just bought a house in Poland where we need around 23 KW electricity per month (+- 300 Euro ) as we have a heat pump for the house and another one for the pool + a big seawater fish tank so its not easy to cut down the consumption Also there is a problem with heavy shading (your picture here is showing my problem very similar ) So I was thinking of buying a system with 29 Panels LG Neon R Black (LG345Q1K-A5) and 29 Enphase IQ7+Microinverters I also considered the Solaredge Optimizers but after reading here and elsewhere that they are less reliable and also are not very good for heavy shading I think its better go with the more expensive Enphase version Do you have another suggestion for heavy shadows? what about the very expensive Sunpower X series Panels ? they seam to work good in shadows without any help of optimizers . Then there are the new ( not yet available ) LG NeON 2 ACe panels with Microinverters included do you think it would be better to wait for these ? Anyway I will continue read your very interesting blog as we have nothing like that here in Europe Have a great day Markus

                  • 05-200 P
                  Jordan said :Guest Report 4 years ago

                  Just realized your failure rates must have been with the M-250 or similar given they were installed 4-5 yrs ago. I was thinking the IQ7 is supposed to be more like 1 in 10,000! Threw me at first... Great blog btw!

                  • 89103
                  Mark C said :administrator Report 4 years ago

                  Hey Matthew. Good to hear the feedback about Solarray. I always good things about them. I agree. Oversizing is usually the best way to go if you want to improve the payback period.

                    Mark C said :administrator Report 4 years ago

                    Hi John, If you don't have shade or multiple orientations, don't go either. Just go Fronius. Optimisers or Microinverters are a weak point on your roof. These next thoughts are my latest regarding Tigo, Enphase and Huawei - I'm about to blog about it but here's a preview :) Tigo optimisers are proving to be unreliable and the company Tigo is just not set up to deal with it. If you just need one or 2 optimisers, go with a Huawei inverter and Huawei optimiser. Why? because unlike Tigo, panel monitoring comes included with Huawei, which is important because there is a reasonable chance of failure in the next 10 years. Additionally, unlike Tigo, Huawei is a company with enough processes to honour the warranty if the optimisers fail. Unfortunately, this is not my experience with our recent numerous Tigo failures. However, if your shade is significant, go Enphase. It's just the best option and proven to be reasonably reliable.

                      Mark C said :administrator Report 4 years ago

                      Hi Cynthia, thanks for sharing your experience. That's a huge failure rate. Very interesting. This is why I would recommend string inverters unless you have shade issues. When the microinverter is out of warranty, that's when you'll really be concerned.

                        John said :Guest Report 4 years ago

                        Hiya, when would you install Tigo optimises vs Enphase? Are there any particular advantages of installing a fully optimised system with Tigo over an Enphase system, or vice versa? Would there be a difference in cost? I read your note about optimisers "bucking" with Huawei... does that apply here too with Tigo, or Enphase? Thanks!!

                        • 2205
                        Cynthia Craft said :Guest Report 4 years ago

                        As a homeowner with a large (42) installation of enphase microinverters on my horse barn roof I take issue with the failure rate. Our installation was done in 2011. Enphase voluntarily replaced 21 of our microinverters. A second microinvertor was replaced when we replaced the roof. This year (2020) 6 microinvertors were replaced. While enphase paid for the invertors we are left paying the installation cost. At any rate we've had 28 microinverter failures on our installation alone which is far more than the 4 stated at the beginning of the article. We're well into the life of the system (9 years) and still experiencing failures.

                        • 01741
                        Matthew Kendall said :Guest Report 4 years ago

                        Great article thank you! I installed 12 M250 inverters with Trina 260 panels and later 25 S270 panels with Trina 270W panels (across four different compass directions) over 5 years ago. My findings and insights are: 1. Performance and reliability have been excellent 2. Service and support have been outstanding - from both installer Solaray and Enphase 3. Economic outcome - with 3 upgrades in capacity over 3 years - payback has moved from 4.2 to 5,5 years - but net lifetime value has increased from $50K to $100K 4. I wish I had of oversized panels 33% - from the data on the Facebook Australian Enphase User group - this oversizing adds about 15% to your annual production. So to me if the price differential for switching from a 270W to a 330W PV panel in my case per unit (PV, Micro, Installation and racking) increases less than 15% (over a 25 year span in this example) from moving to a bigger PV panel - then I would be economically better doing so, and if it doesn't then I shouldn't.

                        • 2113
                        Ian Schirmer said :Guest Report 4 years ago

                        The CQSola hardware and data system is the ONLY system in the world which does not clip. CQSola is the only way to get all of the power from your panels all of the time.

                        • 4129
                        Christopher Staples said :Guest Report 5 years ago

                        Same boat as Bill my enphase units are dropping like flys this year S230 with 250w panels facing West that rarely see 200w, 210w max so micro-inverters should not be getting over worked I am down to 6x working units a couple gone every month this year 2x on branch 1 4x on branch 2 and all dead on branch 3 only thing i can think of is line voltage being too high as when looking at peaks are about around the time something fails 230.80V min 253.17V max 240.31V Average 248.48V Current @ 1:45 pm

                        • 4570
                        Billy said :Guest Report 5 years ago

                        Thank you so much for sharing! Looking forward to learning more.

                        • 94931
                        Mark C said :administrator Report 5 years ago

                        Hi Esmail. I've written a blog that answers your question here:

                          Mark C said :administrator Report 5 years ago

                          Hi Jake, Thanks. I met with Raghu, the founder of Enphase in USA last week. He said the issue is most likely with the tolerance of the ct inside each micro. So I'm going to set up a couple of wattmeters behind each panel and see if that adds up. It's the best explanation they have given me to date.

                            Esmail Attia said :Guest Report 5 years ago

                            I would like to hear your opinion on "Using Micro Inverter on Flat roof installation where MISMATCH can be an issue with production. and in Syd we tilt 30 deg using tripod, but I notice many jobs are installed flat due to COST , We will be glad to hear from you if its warrant to spend the EXTRA money on tilt gears Thank you Esmail Attia

                            • 2196
                            Jake Warner said :Guest Report 5 years ago

                            Hi Mark, Another great blog. Im really interested to hear the response of Enphase about the IQ7+ slightly underperforming agains the IQ7 under normal operation. Cheers, Jake.

                            • 2750
                            Mark C said :administrator Report 5 years ago

                            Ha Ha, exactly. 6.9 percent loss in 1 day!!

                              Kenneth said :Guest Report 5 years ago

                              Hi Mark, Interesting read again! And don't be too hard on yourself for not liking the clipping. My rational self may well be able to explain and understand the economical sense, but that irrational being sitting on my right shoulder would scream "losing money" in my ear every time I would have to look at those flatline graphs!

                              • 2316DT
                              Nigel said :Guest Report 5 years ago

                              Hi Mark we have been installing enphase since 2014 with 300+ systems and over 5000 micros we have only had 5 units fail 2 were M215s they lost their firmware the remaining 3 were m250s they had their internal fuses blown. No s270 or IQ7+ have failed with our systems (We don't use the IQ7 and we move to the newest micro as soon as its released )

                              • 7310
                              Peter T said :Guest Report 5 years ago

                              NFP Yes, I know Pete Thorne from Solaray. He is indeed well respected and I understand he does like to throw a technical curve ball now and then, that's for sure. I have only made his acquaintance online through the Tesla Owner's club.

                              • 2902
                              Mark C said :administrator Report 5 years ago

                              Hi Peter, I confused you with a Pete Thorne, a respected business owner in the Solar industry :) My best advice around the matter is written in the blog: "Installing expensive and complicated power electronics on the roof, primarily to monitor the reliability of simple and affordable technology (diodes and panels) is madness." I'm not sure what you mean by "continuing to spin your wheels", but I'm being supercritical. Solar done right is easily worth it.

                                Peter T said :Guest Report 5 years ago

                                G'day Mark, Thnks for the response and the question, which is appreciated! As an end user, I am not in a position to know the degradation or failure rates of any specific panel(s), other than some of the horror stories you sometimes see in the news. Your critical point about good quality panels is shrewd advice for sure, perhaps even going to the point of selecting a supplier that might still be in business in 25yrs time also. However, I guess my question revoles around issues where a panel (or panels) can still be subject to a manufacturing defects/ tolerances or heavy soiling as just two examples that come to mind. I guess my question resolves down to asking ... is there another way (tricks of the trade you would be prepared to share) where an owner can use tools that might reasonably substitute for panel (level) monitoring? Your answer may have a big bearing on whether I continue to spin my wheels :-) Cheers Peter

                                • 2902
                                Mark C said :administrator Report 5 years ago

                                Hi Peter! I'll ask a question back. (Genuine question). How many panel failures have you picked up compared to Micro Failures? From my experience, if you install a quality panel, you don't need complicated electronics to monitor it. But in this case, I am only relying on my own data.

                                  Mark C said :administrator Report 5 years ago

                                  Hi Peter. I know they will be available "soon". I think that means Q1 or Q2 next year.

                                    Peter T said :Guest Report 5 years ago

                                    PS Do you have any indication from Enphase as to when they might have IQ8s available in OZ and when their full Enphase Ensemble platform would be available also? Cheers Peter T

                                    • 2902
                                    Peter T said :Guest Report 5 years ago

                                    G'day Mark, Another great review mate ... well done ... and thanks. As you may be aware, I have been spinning my wheels for some time now waiting for more mature 3 phase solutions, and rightly or wrongly, have favored panel level monitoring for any number of reasons (e.g. early indicator of panels needing cleaning, real time reports, warranty monitoring, reduced safety risks etc). However, your comments beg question if I may ... and that is ... how does an end user monitor and/or determine (outside of each panel being monitored) where panels have degraded and/or failed below their warranted specs? Would appreciate your advice here mate ... Cheers Peter T ACT

                                    • 2902
                                    Gavan kelly said :Guest Report 5 years ago

                                    Was an interesting read thanks.Would be good to see Enphase vs string. That would be interesting

                                    • 2904
                                    Keiran said :Guest Report 5 years ago

                                    Thanks Mark! Another really interesting blog post. It will be interesting to see if there is anything behind the IQ7 outperforming the IQ7+ when neither are clipping. Please keep us posted :)

                                    • 3057
                                    Mark C said :administrator Report 5 years ago

                                    Hi Les, It's often not too hard on a simple roof. But if the panel is difficult to get to, you may have to remove multiple panels. If the end clamps or mid-claps have seized or they strip, it will get even more difficult - especially in time when it is near impossible to replace the same clamps.

                                      Les Winger said :Guest Report 5 years ago

                                      A very good analysis, especially of a comparison of Enphase inverters to string inverters. I was hoping for more words on Enphase vs. SolarEdge. The SolarEdge inverter would be much easier to replace than a Microinverter. but this is offset by the high failure rate of SoarEdge optimizers. And I don't know how much labor is required to replace an optimizer. Any comments?

                                      • 94024
                                      Dave said :Guest Report 5 years ago

                                      Hi i live near the beach and corrosion has been a problem in the past with guttering electrical fittings electrical boards in evap roof coolers etc so having an inverter in the garage makes sense. My kids live in a 2 storey town house near beach so weighing up the future service and corrosion costs being near salt water a stand alone inverter seems the sensible way to go

                                      • 3197
                                      Mark C said :administrator Report 6 years ago

                                      Hi Bill, interesting. I only had good experiences with Enphase and only heard good things about their reliability. But six or seven years would make it one of the earlier models.

                                        Bill said :Guest Report 6 years ago

                                        My experience with Enphase micro-inverters seems to be quite common: Expect a failure rate of about 50% within 6~7 years, horrible customer service (Enphase WILL NOT speak with owners), and not honoring their warranties. I would suggest anyone considering Enphase products do their due diligence research first. Enphase is unreliable junk in my book.

                                        • 92054

                                        Start typing and press Enter to search

                                        Subscribe To Mark's Blog

                                        Subscribe To Mark's Blog

                                        Join our mailing list to receive the latest information, reviews and solar industry insights from MC Electrical owner Mark Cavanagh.

                                        You have Successfully Subscribed!

                                        Google Rating
                                        Based on 244 reviews