In Blog

Chinese clean energy firm and PV manufacturer, Jinergy (or ‘Jinneng Clean Energy Technology Co. Ltd.’), has been around since 2013 and is already making waves in the clean energy sector. Headquartered in Shanxi Province, China, Jinergy is renowned for their cutting-edge technology. With polycrystalline, Passivated Emitter and Rear Cell (PERC) monocrystalline and HJT panels among their catalogue, the company is one of the leading PV cell and module manufacturers around the world.

The company recently provided 6MW solar panels for Australia’s first utility-sized solar farm, located in Whyalla, South Australia, which no doubt, is a big vote of confidence in the firm from the South Australian government.

MC Electrical was recently asked by Jinergy to test their new 310w HJT bi-facial panel. Unlike your standard solar panels, which are glass-fronted and backed by a plastic sheet, these innovative PV panels are encased in glass, both front and back. Furthermore, the cells within the solar panel are bi-facial. This means that they can absorb light from both the front and the rear of the panel. Depending on the way these panels are positioned on the roof, they can absorb the sunlight being reflected by the roof which hits the underside of the panel, as well as that which comes through the small gaps between the cells. Because the cells are encased in glass, the dead area between cells allows sunlight to filter through and be captured by the underside panels.

Of course, double-glass frames are heavier and more expensive than the standard aluminium frames and plastic backing that you see in traditional solar panels. However, the frameless, double-glass Jinergy panels avoid the dreaded PID (or ‘potential induced degradation’) faced by aluminium frames.

Jinergy isn’t the first to make use of heterojunction technology (with etching on both sides of the solar cell), however, they’re certainly promising impressive results. Their 310w panel is purported to achieve as much as 340 – 370w, or 10 – 20% higher production, when properly positioned (on a reflective commercial rooftop, for example) to capture sunlight from both above and below the panel. Of course, we’ve got to test this for ourselves to be sure the claims are true. We’ll be installing and testing 8 of the Jinergy panels on our warehouse roof and comparing them to 8 of Sunpower’s 345w panels. We’ve chosen to compare with Sunpower as they’re the best panels in the world. If Jinergy’s claims are true, the panels should perform similarly to the Sunpower panels. But only time will tell. We’ll keep you updated as the results come in!

 

Mark

Leave a Reply

2 Comments on "Testing Jinergy’s New Bi-facial Solar Panels"

2 Comments on Testing Jinergy’s New Bi-facial Solar Panels

Mark C said : administrator Report a month ago

Thanks Sven. I'm working on a Tigo blog at the moment. We're heading down that path at the moment, I'm just trying to find faults or design restrictions with it.

Sven Klavsjo said : Guest Report a month ago

Hello Mark, I discovered your blog and web site when I was trying to find facts about Tigo and Maxim optimizers both seems to provide sales talk equivalent to diluted water. i was a little bit shocked to read your results regarding reliability of Solar Edge, on the surface it locked almost like an ideal solution, My experience of Israel companies is about the same if they have a real problem with something they directly go into denial, and say they are not to blame. But that optimizers will cause RF-interference is no surprise to me, Designers and manufactures have never heard about that high power switching could cause wide band RF-noise at more than a thousand times higher frequency than the switching frequency, this is totally unknown to them. To block the RF-noise, the optimizer must be housed in Faraday cage with proper filtering on all external connections. By the way a Ethernet cable without screen can do the same thing on weak RF-signals. The new Jinergy 310w HJT bi-facial panel came as a total surprise to me, it seems to be full production in Asia of the panel Meyer Burger presented on PV Taiwan 2014, but I cannot verify that the new Jinergy bi-facial panel is using SWCT Technology for connection of cells in the panel , this technology negates the effect micro cracks in the solar cell. Even thou I have a Swedish e-mail address I'm permanently living in Thailand. since 2015 I have tried to find a manufacturer of these panels but failed. i therefor tried to buy Sunpreme bifacial panels with similar data minus SWCT Technology. Unfortunately the agent in Thailand have lost interest of Sunpreme bifacial panels, so a small number of panels for testing is not available, a container is minimum. I really appreciate your blog and web site, it contains a lot of things not available anywhere else. Best Regards Sven Klavsjo

  • 36230

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked

avatar
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Sven Klavsjo
Guest
Hello Mark, I discovered your blog and web site when I was trying to find facts about Tigo and Maxim optimizers both seems to provide sales talk equivalent to diluted water. i was a little bit shocked to read your results regarding reliability of Solar Edge, on the surface it locked almost like an ideal solution, My experience of Israel companies is about the same if they have a real problem with something they directly go into denial, and say they are not to blame. But that optimizers will cause RF-interference is no surprise to me, Designers and manufactures have… Read more »
Subscribe to Mark’s Blog

Subscribe to Mark’s Blog

Join the mailing list to receive Mark’s Solar blogs hot off the press.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Subscribe to Mark’s Blog

Subscribe to Mark’s Blog

Join the mailing list to receive Mark’s Solar blogs hot off the press.

You have Successfully Subscribed!